Dod software technology readiness levels
Prototype near or at planned operational system. Represents a major step up from TRL 6 by requiring demonstration of an actual system prototype in an operational environment e.
Supporting information includes results from testing a prototype system in an operational environment. Technology has been proven to work in its final form and under expected conditions. In almost all cases, this TRL represents the end of true system development. Supporting information includes results of testing the system in its final configuration under the expected range of environmental conditions in which it will be expected to operate.
Assessment of whether it will meet its operational requirements. Examples include using the system under operational mission conditions. Contact Us. Search technologies and news. News The 9 Technology Readiness Levels of the DoD From early concept to an application of a technology in it's final form, the technology readiness level TRL is a helpful knowledge-based standard and shorthand for evaluating the maturity of a technology or invention. One is the lowest level of technology readiness and nine is the highest.
Get our free guide to technology transfer and learn the step-by-step process to get started using federal technology transfer to innovate your business faster and with less money.
Click here to download it for free right now. Technology Readiness Level 1: Basic principles observed and reported Lowest level of technology readiness. Technology Readiness Level 7: System prototype demonstration in an operational environment Prototype near or at planned operational system. Manufacturing processes will not be able to mature until the product technology and product design are stable. You must be logged in to post a comment. Leave a Reply Cancel reply You must be logged in to post a comment.
TRL Description. Basic principles observed and reported. Lowest level of technology readiness. Scientific research begins to be translated into applied research and development. Invention begins. Once basic principles are observed, practical applications can be invented. Applications are speculative and there may be no proof or detailed analysis to support the assumptions.
Examples are limited to analytic studies. Active research and development is initiated. This includes analytical studies and laboratory studies to physically validate analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. Examples include components that are not yet integrated or representative. Basic technological components are integrated to establish that they will work together.
Scientific knowledge generated underpinning basic properties of software architecture and mathematical formulation. Invention begins. Once basic principles are observed, practical applications can be invented. Applications are speculative, and there may be no proof or detailed analysis to support the assumptions.
Examples are limited to analytic studies. Publications or other references that outline the application being considered and that provide analysis to support the concept. Invention begins, practical application is identified but is speculative, no experimental proof or detailed analysis is available to support the conjecture.
Practical application is identified but is speculative, no experimental proof or detailed analysis is available to support the conjecture. Basic properties of algorithms, representations and concepts defined.
Basic principles coded. Experiments performed with synthetic data. This includes analytical studies and laboratory studies to physically validate the analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. Examples include components that are not yet integrated or representative. Results of laboratory tests performed to measure parameters of interest and comparison to analytical predictions for critical subsystems.
References to who, where, and when these tests and comparisons were performed. Analytical studies place the technology in an appropriate context and laboratory demonstrations, modeling and simulation validate analytical prediction. Development of limited functionality to validate critical properties and predictions using non-integrated software components. Basic technological components are integrated to establish that they will work together.
System concepts that have been considered and results from testing laboratory- scale breadboard s. References to who did this work and when. Provide an estimate of how breadboard hardware and test results differ from the expected system goals.
Key, functionally critical, software components are integrated, and functionally validated, to establish interoperability and begin architecture development.
0コメント